Alternating Subarray Sum — Problem Statement & Solution Guide

ArraysMediummax-subarray-sum
TimeO(n)
|
SpaceO(1)

Quick Answer & Algorithm Key Takeaway

Master coding challenges related to Arrays and solve the Alternating Subarray Sum problem optimally.

TopicArrays
Patternmax-subarray-sum
TimeO(n)
SpaceO(1)

Problem Description

Given an integer array values, determine the largest possible sum of any contiguous subarray that strictly alternates between positive and negative numbers, beginning with a positive element. The subarray must contain at least one element. If the array does not contain a positive element or no alternating subarray can be formed, return 0.

DSA Pattern Breakdown

DSA Pattern Breakdown

"Alternating Subarray Sum"

medium

WHY DOES IT MATTER?

Alternating‑sign patterns appear in financial signal processing, error‑correction codes, and load‑balancing where opposite‑signed metrics indicate state flips; efficiently extracting the best contiguous alternating segment is crucial for anomaly detection and profit maximization.

OPTIMIZATION CHALLENGE

The key insight is that a valid alternating subarray can only be extended by the opposite‑sign sum from the previous index, allowing us to collapse the DP state to two scalars (posSum, negSum) instead of O(n) tables, thus achieving O(1) space.

REAL-WORLD CONNECTION

Think of a server cluster where request latency spikes (positive) must be followed by cooldown periods (negative) to avoid overload. Finding the longest profitable burst of alternating high‑load and recovery phases mirrors the alternating subarray sum problem.

During the interview, write the recurrence first, then immediately convert it to two rolling variables; this shows you understand optimal substructure and can translate DP into a greedy‑style implementation.

COMPLEXITY AT A GLANCE

⏱ Time:O(n)
💾 Space:O(1)

Core Theory — Why This Approach?

The alternating‑sign subarray problem is a variant of the classic maximum subarray (Kadane) where the sign of consecutive elements must flip, and the first element must be positive. A naive scan that simply adds numbers fails because a negative element can invalidate the alternating property, forcing a restart of the subarray; likewise, a positive element that follows another positive breaks the pattern. To solve it efficiently we maintain two running sums: one for subarrays ending with a positive element (posSum) and one for those ending with a negative element (negSum). When we encounter a positive value we can extend a previously valid negative‑ending subarray (negSum) or start a new subarray; similarly a negative value can extend a positive‑ending subarray (posSum). The maximum of all posSum values encountered is the answer. This DP‑like recurrence runs in linear time and constant extra space, overcoming the O(n²) brute‑force that enumerates all O(n²) subarrays.

The optimal paradigm blends greedy selection with dynamic programming. At each index we make a locally optimal decision—whether to extend the existing alternating chain or to reset—based solely on the sign of the current element and the best sum achievable with the opposite sign at the previous index. Because the decision depends only on the immediate predecessor, the global optimum is guaranteed by optimal substructure, a hallmark of DP solutions like Kadane’s algorithm. This yields an O(n) time, O(1) space solution suitable for large inputs where O(n²) would time out.

Interview Questions on This Problem

Q1How would you modify Kadane’s algorithm to handle the alternating‑sign constraint and ensure the subarray starts with a positive number?

Maintain two variables, posSum and negSum. For a positive a[i], set posSum = a[i] + max(0, negSum) and reset negSum to 0; for a negative a[i], set negSum = a[i] + max(0, posSum) and reset posSum to 0. Track the maximum posSum seen; if no positive element exists, return 0.

Q2What is the time and space complexity of the optimal solution, and why can’t we achieve better than O(n) time?

The optimal solution runs in O(n) time and O(1) extra space because each element is processed once with constant‑time updates. Any algorithm must inspect each element at least once to know whether it can start or extend an alternating subarray, so O(n) is optimal.

Q3In a streaming setting where numbers arrive one‑by‑one, how would you compute the answer without storing the entire array?

Keep only the current posSum, negSum, and global maxPos. Update them as each new value arrives using the same recurrence; this uses O(1) memory and works for an infinite stream, outputting the max alternating sum seen so far.

Examples

Example 1

Input

[5,-2,3,-1,2,-4,6]

Output

9

Explanation: Starting at index 0 yields the longest alternating sequence 5,-2,3,-1,2,-4,6. Its sum is 5-2+3-1+2-4+6=9, which is larger than any other valid subarray.

Example 2

Input

[-3,2,-5,4,-1]

Output

4

Explanation: Valid alternating subarrays that start with a positive number are: [2] (sum 2), [2,-5] (‑3), [2,-5,4] (1), [2,-5,4,-1] (0), [4] (4), [4,-1] (3). The maximum sum is 4.

Example 3

Input

[-1,-2,-3]

Output

0

Explanation: The array contains no positive element, therefore no subarray can satisfy the required pattern; the answer is 0.

Constraints

  • 1 <= values.length <= 100000
  • -1000000000 <= values[i] <= 1000000000
  • The algorithm should run in O(n) time and O(1) additional space

Optimal Approach & Strategy

Traverse once, maintaining posSum and negSum using sign‑aware transitions; update a global maxPos whenever posSum improves.

Brute Force Approach

Enumerate every possible subarray, check if it alternates starting with a positive, and compute its sum, keeping the maximum.

Code Solutions

JavaScript Solution
Time: O(n)
function maxAlternatingSubarraySum(values){
    let maxSum = 0;
    let curSum = 0;
    let expectNeg = false; // after a positive we expect a negative
    for(const v of values){
        if(v>0){
            if(!expectNeg){
                curSum += v;
                expectNeg = true;
            }else{ // two positives in a row -> restart at this positive
                curSum = v;
                expectNeg = true;
            }
        }else if(v<0){
            if(expectNeg){
                curSum += v;
                expectNeg = false;
            }else{ // negative where positive expected -> reset
                curSum = 0;
                expectNeg = false;
            }
        }else{ // zero breaks the pattern
            curSum = 0;
            expectNeg = false;
        }
        if(curSum>maxSum) maxSum = curSum;
    }
    return maxSum;
}

Asked in Top Tech Interviews

Microsoft

Solve in Interative Editor

Ready to test your code? Open our built-in compiler, run custom test suites, and see detailed complexity analysis reports instantly.