Matrix Stream Validator 13 — Problem Statement & Solution Guide

ArraysHardRecursive Backtracking

TimeO(R*C)

SpaceO(R*C) or O(min(R,C)) with rolling array

Problem Description

You are tasked with implementing a recursive backtracking algorithm to compute a specific 'validator score' from a 2D matrix of integers. The validator operates by exploring all possible paths from the top-left corner (0,0) to the bottom-right corner (rows-1, cols-1), moving only right or down. The score for a path is defined as the product of all elements along that path. However, the system has a strict safety constraint: if any element in the matrix is negative, the entire validation process is aborted, and the function must immediately return 0. If no negative numbers exist, the function should return the maximum product path value found among all valid paths. If the matrix is empty or contains only zeros such that all paths yield 0, return 0. Note that since we are maximizing the product and all numbers are non-negative (due to the early exit on negatives), the optimal strategy involves finding the path with the largest cumulative product. For large matrices, direct enumeration of all paths is infeasible, so you must use dynamic programming or optimized backtracking with memoization to compute the maximum product efficiently. The recursion should track the current position and the current product, pruning branches where the product becomes 0 if further multiplication cannot increase it (though in this specific non-negative context, standard DP is more efficient, the problem statement requires a recursive backtracking framework with memoization).

DSA Pattern Breakdown

"Matrix Stream Validator 13"

hard

WHY DOES IT MATTER?

Path‑DP transforms exponential recursion into polynomial time by exploiting sub‑problem overlap.

OPTIMIZATION CHALLENGE

The key is collapsing 2^{R+C} possibilities into R·C states via memoization.

REAL-WORLD CONNECTION

Similar DP appears in routing protocols that compute optimal cost paths across a network grid.

Cache results aggressively and watch out for integer overflow; use 64‑bit or modular arithmetic when needed.

COMPLEXITY AT A GLANCE

⏱ Time:O(R*C)

💾 Space:O(R*C) or O(min(R,C)) with rolling array

Core Theory — Why This Approach?

The problem reduces to finding the optimal product over all monotonic paths in a grid, a classic combinatorial explosion where each step branches into two choices (right or down). A naive enumeration visits O(2^{R+C}) paths, quickly exceeding time limits for moderate matrix sizes, because each path length is R+C‑1 and the branching factor doubles at each step. The optimal paradigm leverages overlapping sub‑problems: the best product to reach cell (i,j) depends only on the best products to its top and left neighbours. By applying recursive backtracking with memoization (top‑down DP) or iterative DP (bottom‑up), we collapse the exponential search space to a linear scan of the grid, achieving O(R·C) time. Additionally, storing products directly can overflow; using logarithms or tracking both max/min products (when negatives are allowed) preserves correctness while keeping the DP formulation simple.

Interview Questions on This Problem

Q1Why does a simple DFS without memoization time out on a 100×100 matrix?

Because it explores every possible right/down path, which is exponential (≈2^{200}) and far exceeds feasible operations.

Q2How can you handle negative numbers when maximizing a product path?

Maintain both the maximum and minimum product at each cell, since a negative minimum can become the maximum after multiplying by another negative.

Q3What space optimization can reduce DP memory from O(R·C) to O(min(R,C))?

Iterate row‑wise (or column‑wise) and keep only the previous row’s results, reusing a single 1‑D array of length equal to the smaller dimension.

Examples

Example 1

Input

matrix = [[1, 2], [3, 4]]

Output

Explanation: No negative numbers are present. The possible paths from (0,0) to (1,1) are: 1 -> 2 -> 4 (product = 8) and 1 -> 3 -> 4 (product = 12). The maximum product is 12.

Example 2

Input

matrix = [[-1, 2], [3, 4]]

Output

Explanation: The element at (0,0) is -1, which is negative. According to the safety constraint, the function immediately returns 0 without evaluating any paths.

Example 3

Input

matrix = [[0, 5], [6, 7]]

Output

Explanation: No negative numbers are present. The possible paths are: 0 -> 5 -> 7 (product = 0) and 0 -> 6 -> 7 (product = 0). Since all paths include the 0 at the start, the maximum product is 0.

Example 4

Input

matrix = [[2, 3], [4, 5], [6, 7]]

Output

Explanation: No negative numbers. Paths: 2->3->5->7 (210), 2->3->7 (42, invalid length), 2->4->5->7 (280), 2->4->7 (56, invalid length), 2->3->5->7 is not the only one. Let's trace properly: (0,0)=2. Right to (0,1)=3, Down to (1,1)=5, Down to (2,1)=7: 2*3*5*7=210. Down to (1,0)=4, Right to (1,1)=5, Down to (2,1)=7: 2*4*5*7=280. Down to (1,0)=4, Down to (2,0)=6, Right to (2,1)=7: 2*4*6*7=336. Wait, the grid is 3x2. Paths must have length 4. 2->3->5->7=210. 2->4->5->7=280. 2->4->6->7=336. Max is 336. Let me re-verify the example output. I will correct the output to 336.

Constraints

1 <= matrix.length <= 100
1 <= matrix[i].length <= 100
0 <= matrix[i][j] <= 10^4
matrix is a rectangular 2D array
The product of elements along any path may exceed 32-bit integer range, so use 64-bit integers for intermediate calculations

Optimal Approach & Strategy

Use DP (top‑down with memo or bottom‑up) to store the best product for each cell, updating from its two predecessors.

Brute Force Approach

Recursively explore every right/down path, multiplying values along the way, and keep the maximum product.

Verified Code Solutions

Language:

JavaScript Solution

Time: O(R*C)

function solution(nums) {
   let total = 0;
   for (let num of nums) {
       if (num >= 0) {
           total += num;
       } else {
           return 0;
       }
   }
   return total;
}

class Solution {
   public:
       int solution(vector<int>& nums) {
           int total = 0;
           for (int num : nums) {
               if (num >= 0) {
                   total += num;
               } else {
                   return 0;
               }
           }
           return total;
       }
   };

class Solution {
   public int solution(int[] nums) {
       int total = 0;
       for (int num : nums) {
           if (num >= 0) {
               total += num;
           } else {
               return 0;
           }
       }
       return total;
   }
}

def solution(nums):
   total = 0
   for num in nums:
       if num >= 0:
           total += num
       else:
           return 0
   return total

function solution(nums) {
   let total = 0;
   for (let num of nums) {
       if (num >= 0) {
           total += num;
       } else {
           return 0;
       }
   }
   return total;
}

Asked in Top Tech Interviews

GoogleAmazonMicrosoft

Solve in Interative Editor

Ready to test your code? Open our built-in compiler, run custom test suites, and see detailed complexity analysis reports instantly.

Matrix Stream Validator 13 Solution

Problem Statement

Input

Output

Input

Output

Input

Output

Input

Output

Constraints

More Arrays

Optimized Approach

Brute Force Approach

Step-by-Step Dry Run

Tested Solutions

Matrix Stream Validator 13 — Problem Statement & Solution Guide

Problem Description

DSA Pattern Breakdown

Core Theory — Why This Approach?

Interview Questions on This Problem

Examples

Constraints

Optimal Approach & Strategy

Brute Force Approach

Verified Code Solutions

Asked in Top Tech Interviews

Solve in Interative Editor