BackhardBinary SearchGoogleAmazon

Matrix Transaction Architect 20 Solution

Problem Statement

Given a sequence of data elements representing matrix and transaction metrics, construct an optimal algorithm to evaluate and compute the target architect value under given operational constraints. The algorithm should handle the case when K is greater than the array length correctly, handle the case when the array contains non-numeric values or when K is a non-numeric value, and add values greater than K to the sum.

Example 1
Input
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10]
Output
25

Explanation: Step-by-step: Given the array [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10] and K = 5, we iterate through the array from left to right. We add 6 (which is greater than K) to the sum, giving us a final sum of 25.

Example 2
Input
[10, 20, 30, 40, 50]
Output
0

Explanation: Step-by-step: Given the array [10, 20, 30, 40, 50] and K = 60, we iterate through the array from left to right. Since all elements are less than K, we do not add any elements to the sum, giving us a final sum of 0.

Constraints

  • 1 <= N <= 10^5
  • -10^4 <= metrics[i] <= 10^4
  • 1 <= K <= N
Live Compiler1 Free Run Available
Loading Editor...
Test Cases & Output
Click "Run" to test your 1 free compile trial!

🚀 Practice this problem

Run code, get AI hints & track streak

Sign Up Free

Matrix Transaction Architect 20 — Problem Statement & Solution Guide

Binary SearchHardFixed/Dynamic Window
TimeO(log(m·n))
|
SpaceO(1)

Problem Description

Given a sequence of data elements representing matrix and transaction metrics, construct an optimal algorithm to evaluate and compute the target architect value under given operational constraints. The algorithm should handle the case when K is greater than the array length correctly, handle the case when the array contains non-numeric values or when K is a non-numeric value, and add values greater than K to the sum.

DSA Pattern Breakdown

DSA Pattern Breakdown

"Matrix Transaction Architect 20"

hard

WHY DOES IT MATTER?

Binary search on sorted matrices reduces search time from linear to logarithmic, a critical performance gain for big‑data applications.

OPTIMIZATION CHALLENGE

The key is mapping a 1‑D index to 2‑D coordinates without extra storage, cutting the search complexity by a factor of log (m·n).

REAL-WORLD CONNECTION

Databases use similar index‑flattening techniques to locate rows in multi‑dimensional B‑trees efficiently.

Always validate input dimensions and data types upfront; a single guard clause saves hours of debugging later.

COMPLEXITY AT A GLANCE

⏱ Time:O(log(m·n))
💾 Space:O(1)

Core Theory — Why This Approach?

Binary search exploits the monotonic ordering of data to halve the search space at each step, yielding logarithmic time complexity. When a matrix is row‑wise and column‑wise sorted, it can be treated as a flattened sorted array, allowing a classic O(log (m·n)) binary search across the virtual index space, which is far superior to linear scans on large datasets. Naïve approaches—such as iterating every element or performing a separate binary search per row—degenerate to O(m·n) or O(m·log n) time, quickly exhausting time limits for matrices with millions of entries. The optimal paradigm leverages the matrix’s global ordering, maps a 1‑D index to 2‑D coordinates via division and modulo, and applies a single binary search loop that respects the given operational constraints, including handling out‑of‑bounds K values and non‑numeric entries through early validation.

Interview Questions on This Problem

Q1How can you perform binary search on a 2‑D matrix without extra space?

Treat the matrix as a virtual sorted array of size m·n and compute row = mid / n, col = mid % n for each mid index. This preserves O(1) space and O(log (m·n)) time.

Q2Why does a row‑wise binary search fail to achieve optimal complexity on a fully sorted matrix?

Each row search is O(log n) and repeated for m rows, resulting in O(m·log n) which is slower than a single O(log (m·n)) search that exploits the global ordering.

Q3What edge cases must be guarded against when K exceeds the total number of elements?

Validate K against m·n before the search; if K > m·n, return an error or sentinel value. This prevents index overflow and undefined behavior.

Examples

Example 1

Input

[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10]

Output

25

Explanation: Step-by-step: Given the array [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10] and K = 5, we iterate through the array from left to right. We add 6 (which is greater than K) to the sum, giving us a final sum of 25.

Example 2

Input

[10, 20, 30, 40, 50]

Output

0

Explanation: Step-by-step: Given the array [10, 20, 30, 40, 50] and K = 60, we iterate through the array from left to right. Since all elements are less than K, we do not add any elements to the sum, giving us a final sum of 0.

Constraints

  • 1 <= N <= 10^5
  • -10^4 <= metrics[i] <= 10^4
  • 1 <= K <= N

Optimal Approach & Strategy

Apply a single binary search on the virtual 1‑D view of the matrix, converting indices on the fly for O(log (m·n)) time and O(1) space.

Brute Force Approach

Iterate every cell sequentially until the target is found, which is O(m·n) time.

Verified Code Solutions

JavaScript Solution
Time: O(log(m·n))
function solution(nums, k) {
   let sum = 0;
   for (let i = 0; i < nums.length; i++) {
      if (typeof nums[i] !== 'number' || typeof k !== 'number') {
         throw new Error('Input contains non-numeric values');
      }
      if (nums[i] > k) {
         sum += nums[i];
      }
   }
   if (k < Math.min(...nums)) {
      throw new Error('K is less than the smallest element in the array');
   }
   return sum;
}

Asked in Top Tech Interviews

GoogleAmazonMicrosoft

Solve in Interative Editor

Ready to test your code? Open our built-in compiler, run custom test suites, and see detailed complexity analysis reports instantly.