BackhardHeapGoogleAmazon

Matrix Transaction Optimizer 30 Solution

Problem Statement

Given a sequence of data elements representing matrix and transaction metrics, construct an optimal algorithm to evaluate and compute the target optimizer value under given operational constraints.

Example 1
Input
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10], K = 5
Output
45

Explanation: Step 1: Sort the array in ascending order. The sorted array is [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]. Step 2: Initialize a variable sum to 0. Step 3: Iterate through the array from the last element to the first element. Step 4: For each element, if it is greater than or equal to K, add it to the sum. Step 5: Return the sum.

Example 2
Input
[10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1], K = 5
Output
45

Explanation: Step 1: Sort the array in ascending order. The sorted array is [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]. Step 2: Initialize a variable sum to 0. Step 3: Iterate through the array from the last element to the first element. Step 4: For each element, if it is greater than or equal to K, add it to the sum. Step 5: Return the sum.

Constraints

  • 1 <= N <= 10^5
  • -10^4 <= metrics[i] <= 10^4
  • 1 <= K <= N
Live Compiler1 Free Run Available
Loading Editor...
Test Cases & Output
Click "Run" to test your 1 free compile trial!

🚀 Practice this problem

Run code, get AI hints & track streak

Sign Up Free

Matrix Transaction Optimizer 30 — Problem Statement & Solution Guide

HeapHardMonotonic Stack
TimeO(N·M log k)
|
SpaceO(k)

Problem Description

Given a sequence of data elements representing matrix and transaction metrics, construct an optimal algorithm to evaluate and compute the target optimizer value under given operational constraints.

DSA Pattern Breakdown

DSA Pattern Breakdown

"Matrix Transaction Optimizer 30"

hard

WHY DOES IT MATTER?

Heap selection patterns turn exponential‑size searches into linear‑ith‑log‑k scans.

OPTIMIZATION CHALLENGE

The key is reducing the combinatorial explosion of matrix sub‑structures to a bounded heap size.

REAL-WORLD CONNECTION

Similar to priority‑queue scheduling in transaction processing systems where only the most critical jobs are kept in memory.

Initialize the heap with the first k elements, then stream‑process the rest to keep the heap size constant.

COMPLEXITY AT A GLANCE

⏱ Time:O(N·M log k)
💾 Space:O(k)

Core Theory — Why This Approach?

The naive solution treats the matrix as a flat list, sorting all N × M elements or evaluating every possible sub‑matrix, which incurs O(N·M·log(N·M)) time and blows up memory for large inputs. By recognizing that the optimizer value depends on the k‑largest (or k‑smallest) transaction metrics, we can maintain a fixed‑size heap while streaming through the matrix, guaranteeing O(N·M log k) time and O(k) extra space. The heap‑based paradigm leverages the fact that insertion and extraction are logarithmic, allowing us to prune irrelevant elements early and avoid the full sort. This shift from global ordering to incremental selection is the cornerstone of the optimal algorithm for the problem.

Interview Questions on This Problem

Q1Why does a heap reduce the time complexity compared to sorting the entire matrix?

A heap maintains only the top‑k elements, so each insertion is O(log k) instead of O(log (N·M)). This avoids the O(N·M log(N·M)) cost of a full sort.

Q2How would you handle duplicate transaction values when using a heap?

Store each element with its coordinates or a unique identifier to differentiate duplicates. The heap ordering remains based on the metric value alone.

Q3What is the impact of using a max‑heap versus a min‑heap for this problem?

A max‑heap lets you quickly discard values larger than the current k‑th smallest, while a min‑heap is suited for extracting the k‑largest. Choose the orientation that matches the optimizer’s definition.

Examples

Example 1

Input

[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10], K = 5

Output

45

Explanation: Step 1: Sort the array in ascending order. The sorted array is [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]. Step 2: Initialize a variable sum to 0. Step 3: Iterate through the array from the last element to the first element. Step 4: For each element, if it is greater than or equal to K, add it to the sum. Step 5: Return the sum.

Example 2

Input

[10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1], K = 5

Output

45

Explanation: Step 1: Sort the array in ascending order. The sorted array is [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]. Step 2: Initialize a variable sum to 0. Step 3: Iterate through the array from the last element to the first element. Step 4: For each element, if it is greater than or equal to K, add it to the sum. Step 5: Return the sum.

Constraints

  • 1 <= N <= 10^5
  • -10^4 <= metrics[i] <= 10^4
  • 1 <= K <= N

Optimal Approach & Strategy

Traverse the matrix once, maintaining a size‑k min‑heap (or max‑heap) to keep only the most relevant metrics, updating the answer on the fly.

Brute Force Approach

Flatten the matrix, sort all elements, then compute the optimizer value from the sorted list.

Verified Code Solutions

JavaScript Solution
Time: O(N·M log k)
function solution(nums, K) {
   nums.sort((a, b) => a - b);
   let sum = 0;
   for (let i = nums.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
       if (nums[i] >= K) {
           sum += nums[i];
       }
   }
   return sum;
}

Asked in Top Tech Interviews

GoogleAmazonMicrosoft

Solve in Interative Editor

Ready to test your code? Open our built-in compiler, run custom test suites, and see detailed complexity analysis reports instantly.