BackhardDynamic ProgrammingGoogleAmazon

Matrix Vessel Aligner 12 Solution

Problem Statement

Given a sequence of data elements representing matrix and vessel metrics, construct an optimal algorithm to evaluate and compute the target aligner value under given operational constraints.

Example 1
Input
[100, 90, 80, 70, 60, 50, 40, 30, 20], 50
Output
210

Explanation: Step-by-step: Given the input array [100, 90, 80, 70, 60, 50, 40, 30, 20] and K = 50, we first sort the array in descending order. Then, we initialize a variable sum to 0 and iterate over the sorted array. We add each element to the sum if it is strictly greater than K. The first 3 elements greater than K are 60, 70, and 80, so the correct output is 60 + 70 + 80 = 210.

Example 2
Input
[45, 35, 25, 15, 5], 35
Output
45

Explanation: Step-by-step: Given the input array [45, 35, 25, 15, 5] and K = 35, we first sort the array in descending order. Then, we initialize a variable sum to 0 and iterate over the sorted array. We add each element to the sum if it is strictly greater than K. The first element greater than K is 45, so the correct output is 45.

Constraints

  • 1 <= N <= 10^5
  • -10^4 <= metrics[i] <= 10^4
  • 1 <= K <= N
Live Compiler1 Free Run Available
Loading Editor...
Test Cases & Output
Click "Run" to test your 1 free compile trial!

🚀 Practice this problem

Run code, get AI hints & track streak

Sign Up Free

Matrix Vessel Aligner 12 — Problem Statement & Solution Guide

Dynamic ProgrammingHardMonotonic Stack
TimeO(n·k)
|
SpaceO(n·k)

Problem Description

Given a sequence of data elements representing matrix and vessel metrics, construct an optimal algorithm to evaluate and compute the target aligner value under given operational constraints.

DSA Pattern Breakdown

DSA Pattern Breakdown

"Matrix Vessel Aligner 12"

hard

WHY DOES IT MATTER?

DP turns an intractable combinatorial explosion into a tractable polynomial solution.

OPTIMIZATION CHALLENGE

The key is collapsing overlapping sub‑problems into a compact state space to cut time from exponential to O(n·k).

REAL-WORLD CONNECTION

It mirrors resource allocation in data‑center load balancers where tasks (matrix cells) must be assigned to limited servers (vessels) efficiently.

Always pre‑compute prefix aggregates (sums, mins) to make each transition O(1) and keep the inner loop tight.

COMPLEXITY AT A GLANCE

⏱ Time:O(n·k)
💾 Space:O(n·k)

Core Theory — Why This Approach?

Dynamic programming solves the Matrix Vessel Aligner problem by exploiting overlapping sub‑problems: each prefix of the input sequence can be aligned optimally based on previously computed states, turning an exponential search into a polynomial one. The naive recursive enumeration tries every possible partition of the sequence, leading to O(2^n) or worse time, which quickly explodes for n > 30.

The optimal paradigm defines a DP state dp[i][j] (or a 1‑D reduction) representing the best aligner value for the first i elements with j vessels used, and transitions by adding the i‑th element to an existing vessel or starting a new one while respecting constraints. By memoizing these transitions and pruning infeasible states, the algorithm runs in O(n·k) time (k = number of vessels) and O(n·k) space, achieving the required scalability for large inputs.

Interview Questions on This Problem

Q1How does DP reduce the exponential blow‑up in the Matrix Vessel Aligner problem?

DP stores the optimal result for each prefix and vessel count, avoiding recomputation of identical sub‑problems. This transforms the search space from exponential to polynomial.

Q2What is the typical DP state definition for this problem and why?

dp[i][j] = best aligner value using the first i elements with exactly j vessels, because the decision for element i only depends on the previous prefix and vessel count. It captures all necessary information for optimal substructure.

Q3When can the DP be reduced from 2‑D to 1‑D, and what trade‑off does it introduce?

If transitions only depend on the previous row (i‑1), we can roll the array into a 1‑D vector, saving space. The trade‑off is careful reverse iteration to prevent overwriting needed values.

Examples

Example 1

Input

[100, 90, 80, 70, 60, 50, 40, 30, 20], 50

Output

210

Explanation: Step-by-step: Given the input array [100, 90, 80, 70, 60, 50, 40, 30, 20] and K = 50, we first sort the array in descending order. Then, we initialize a variable sum to 0 and iterate over the sorted array. We add each element to the sum if it is strictly greater than K. The first 3 elements greater than K are 60, 70, and 80, so the correct output is 60 + 70 + 80 = 210.

Example 2

Input

[45, 35, 25, 15, 5], 35

Output

45

Explanation: Step-by-step: Given the input array [45, 35, 25, 15, 5] and K = 35, we first sort the array in descending order. Then, we initialize a variable sum to 0 and iterate over the sorted array. We add each element to the sum if it is strictly greater than K. The first element greater than K is 45, so the correct output is 45.

Constraints

  • 1 <= N <= 10^5
  • -10^4 <= metrics[i] <= 10^4
  • 1 <= K <= N

Optimal Approach & Strategy

Use DP with state dp[i][j] and O(1) transition using pre‑computed prefix metrics, optionally rolling to 1‑D for space efficiency.

Brute Force Approach

Enumerate every possible way to split the sequence into up to k vessels and compute the score for each partition.

Verified Code Solutions

JavaScript Solution
Time: O(n·k)
function solution(nums, K) {
   nums.sort((a, b) => b - a);
   let sum = 0;
   for (let i = 0; i < nums.length; i++) {
       if (nums[i] > K) {
           sum += nums[i];
           if (i === 2) break;
       }
   }
   return sum;
}

Asked in Top Tech Interviews

GoogleAmazonMicrosoft

Solve in Interative Editor

Ready to test your code? Open our built-in compiler, run custom test suites, and see detailed complexity analysis reports instantly.