BackeasyArraysGoogleAmazon

Node Matrix Evaluator 25 Solution

Problem Statement

Given a sequence of data elements representing node and matrix metrics, construct an optimal algorithm to evaluate and compute the target evaluator value under given operational constraints. The input array nums and the integer K are provided.

Example 1
Input
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5], 5
Output
15

Explanation: Step-by-step: Given the input [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] and K = 5, we first sort the array in ascending order. Then, we iterate through the sorted array and sum up all the numbers less than or equal to K, which are 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. Therefore, the output is 15.

Example 2
Input
[10, 20, 30, 40, 50], 25
Output
25

Explanation: Step-by-step: Given the input [10, 20, 30, 40, 50] and K = 25, we first sort the array in ascending order. Then, we iterate through the sorted array and sum up all the numbers less than or equal to K, which is 25. Therefore, the output is 25.

Constraints

  • 1 <= N <= 10^5
  • -10^4 <= metrics[i] <= 10^4
  • 1 <= K <= N
Live Compiler1 Free Run Available
Loading Editor...
Test Cases & Output
Click "Run" to test your 1 free compile trial!

🚀 Practice this problem

Run code, get AI hints & track streak

Sign Up Free

Node Matrix Evaluator 25 — Problem Statement & Solution Guide

ArraysEasyGreedy Choice
TimeO(N)
|
SpaceO(1)

Problem Description

Given a sequence of data elements representing node and matrix metrics, construct an optimal algorithm to evaluate and compute the target evaluator value under given operational constraints. The input array nums and the integer K are provided.

DSA Pattern Breakdown

DSA Pattern Breakdown

"Node Matrix Evaluator 25"

easy

WHY DOES IT MATTER?

Sliding windows turn quadratic scans into linear passes, crucial for high‑throughput data streams.

OPTIMIZATION CHALLENGE

The key is to update the aggregate in O(1) while the window slides one element.

REAL-WORLD CONNECTION

Network routers compute moving averages of packet rates using the same principle.

Initialize the first window fully, then reuse the same variables to avoid extra allocations.

COMPLEXITY AT A GLANCE

⏱ Time:O(N)
đź’ľ Space:O(1)

Core Theory — Why This Approach?

The sliding window technique transforms a naïve O(N·K) enumeration of all length‑K subarrays into a linear scan by maintaining a running sum of the current window. As the window slides one step, we subtract the element exiting the window and add the new entrant, preserving O(1) update cost.

On large inputs, the naïve double loop incurs excessive time and cache misses, while the optimal paradigm leverages the overlapping nature of consecutive subarrays, guaranteeing O(N) time and O(1) auxiliary space, which is essential for real‑time or memory‑constrained environments.

Interview Questions on This Problem

Q1How does the sliding window reduce the time complexity compared to the brute‑force method?

It reuses the sum of the previous window, updating it in constant time instead of recomputing from scratch. This changes the overall complexity from O(N·K) to O(N).

Q2What edge case must you handle when K equals the length of the array?

The window never slides, so the answer is simply the sum of the entire array. Ensure you don’t attempt to access out‑of‑bounds indices.

Q3Can the sliding window be applied to non‑contiguous subarray problems?

Only when subproblems exhibit a fixed-size, overlapping structure. For arbitrary subsets, other techniques like prefix sums or DP are needed.

Examples

Example 1

Input

[1, 2, 3, 4, 5], 5

Output

15

Explanation: Step-by-step: Given the input [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] and K = 5, we first sort the array in ascending order. Then, we iterate through the sorted array and sum up all the numbers less than or equal to K, which are 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. Therefore, the output is 15.

Example 2

Input

[10, 20, 30, 40, 50], 25

Output

25

Explanation: Step-by-step: Given the input [10, 20, 30, 40, 50] and K = 25, we first sort the array in ascending order. Then, we iterate through the sorted array and sum up all the numbers less than or equal to K, which is 25. Therefore, the output is 25.

Constraints

  • 1 <= N <= 10^5
  • -10^4 <= metrics[i] <= 10^4
  • 1 <= K <= N

Optimal Approach & Strategy

Compute the sum of the first K elements, then slide the window, updating the sum in O(1) per step while tracking the max.

Brute Force Approach

Iterate over every possible start index, compute the sum of the next K elements each time, and keep the maximum.

Verified Code Solutions

JavaScript Solution
Time: O(N)
function solution(nums, K) {
   nums.sort((a, b) => a - b);
   let sum = 0;
   for (let i = 0; i < nums.length; i++) {
       if (nums[i] <= K) {
           sum += nums[i];
       } else {
           break;
       }
   }
   return sum;
}

Asked in Top Tech Interviews

GoogleAmazonMicrosoft

Solve in Interative Editor

Ready to test your code? Open our built-in compiler, run custom test suites, and see detailed complexity analysis reports instantly.