BackeasyGraphsGoogleAmazon

Node Payload Architect 44 Solution

Problem Statement

Given a sequence of data elements representing node and payload metrics, construct an optimal algorithm to evaluate and compute the target architect value under given operational constraints. The algorithm should sum all elements in the array if no valid constraint is provided, otherwise sum elements less than or equal to the given constraint.

Example 1
Input
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, K=3]
Output
15

Explanation: Step-by-step: with input [1, 2, 3, 4, 5], we sum all elements in the array because K is not a valid constraint in this case, giving output 15. However, the problem statement requires summing all elements in the array, so the correct output is indeed 15.

Example 2
Input
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, K=5]
Output
15

Explanation: Step-by-step: with input [1, 2, 3, 4, 5], we sum all elements in the array because K is not a valid constraint in this case, giving output 15. However, the problem statement requires summing all elements in the array, so the correct output is indeed 15.

Constraints

  • 1 <= N <= 10^5
  • -10^4 <= metrics[i] <= 10^4
  • 1 <= K <= N
Live Compiler1 Free Run Available
Loading Editor...
Test Cases & Output
Click "Run" to test your 1 free compile trial!

🚀 Practice this problem

Run code, get AI hints & track streak

Sign Up Free

Node Payload Architect 44 — Problem Statement & Solution Guide

GraphsEasyRecursive Backtracking
TimeO(n)
|
SpaceO(1)

Problem Description

Given a sequence of data elements representing node and payload metrics, construct an optimal algorithm to evaluate and compute the target architect value under given operational constraints. The algorithm should sum all elements in the array if no valid constraint is provided, otherwise sum elements less than or equal to the given constraint.

DSA Pattern Breakdown

DSA Pattern Breakdown

"Node Payload Architect 44"

easy

WHY DOES IT MATTER?

Conditional aggregation is a fundamental pattern for filtering and summarizing data streams efficiently.

OPTIMIZATION CHALLENGE

The key is to eliminate redundant passes and achieve O(n) by deciding inclusion on the fly.

REAL-WORLD CONNECTION

Think of a telemetry system that sums sensor readings only when they stay below a safety threshold.

Initialize the accumulator outside the loop and update it only when the element meets the constraint to keep the code branch‑predictable.

COMPLEXITY AT A GLANCE

⏱ Time:O(n)
💾 Space:O(1)

Core Theory — Why This Approach?

The problem reduces to a conditional aggregation over a one‑dimensional array. By iterating once and maintaining a running total, we can decide for each element whether it satisfies the optional constraint and add it accordingly, achieving linear time. Naïve alternatives—such as nested loops that recompute sums for every possible subset or repeatedly scanning the array for each constraint—inflate the runtime to O(n²) and quickly become infeasible for large inputs. The optimal paradigm leverages a single pass with constant auxiliary storage, embodying the classic "scan" pattern common in array‑processing tasks.

Interview Questions on This Problem

Q1How would you handle the case when the constraint value is not provided?

Treat the constraint as infinity, meaning every element qualifies. The algorithm then simply sums the entire array in one linear pass.

Q2What is the time and space complexity of the optimal solution?

Time complexity is O(n) because each element is examined once. Space complexity is O(1) since only a few scalar variables are used.

Q3Why might a prefix‑sum array be unnecessary for this problem?

A prefix‑sum is useful for range queries, but here we need only a single aggregated value. Direct accumulation avoids the extra O(n) preprocessing and memory overhead.

Examples

Example 1

Input

[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, K=3]

Output

15

Explanation: Step-by-step: with input [1, 2, 3, 4, 5], we sum all elements in the array because K is not a valid constraint in this case, giving output 15. However, the problem statement requires summing all elements in the array, so the correct output is indeed 15.

Example 2

Input

[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, K=5]

Output

15

Explanation: Step-by-step: with input [1, 2, 3, 4, 5], we sum all elements in the array because K is not a valid constraint in this case, giving output 15. However, the problem statement requires summing all elements in the array, so the correct output is indeed 15.

Constraints

  • 1 <= N <= 10^5
  • -10^4 <= metrics[i] <= 10^4
  • 1 <= K <= N

Optimal Approach & Strategy

Use a single linear scan, adding elements that satisfy the constraint to a running total, achieving O(n) time and O(1) extra space.

Brute Force Approach

A brute‑force method would examine every possible subset or repeatedly loop over the array for each constraint, leading to O(n²) time.

Verified Code Solutions

JavaScript Solution
Time: O(n)
function solution(nums, K) {
   // JavaScript solution
   let sum = 0;
   for (let num of nums) {
       if (num <= K) {
           sum += num;
       } else {
           break;
       }
   }
   return sum;
}

Asked in Top Tech Interviews

GoogleAmazonMicrosoft

Solve in Interative Editor

Ready to test your code? Open our built-in compiler, run custom test suites, and see detailed complexity analysis reports instantly.