Node Vault Validator 26 — Problem Statement & Solution Guide
Problem Description
You are tasked with implementing a validation protocol for a distributed storage system. The system maintains a linear sequence of integer metrics, where each element represents the load factor of a specific node. A 'Vault Validator' is defined as a contiguous subsequence of these metrics that satisfies two conditions: the sum of the elements in the subsequence must be exactly equal to a target value T, and the length of the subsequence must be at least 2. Your objective is to determine the maximum possible length of such a valid validator sequence. If no such sequence exists, return 0.
The input consists of an array of integers representing the node metrics and an integer target T. You must process the array to find the longest contiguous segment whose sum matches T. Note that the array may contain negative integers, which implies that the standard two-pointer technique for positive-only arrays does not apply directly; however, the problem constraints and specific pattern requirements suggest a focused search strategy. Given the 'Recursive Backtracking' pattern tag in the metadata, while the optimal solution for this specific 'longest subarray with sum K' problem is typically O(N) using a prefix sum hash map, the problem statement here is framed to test the ability to identify valid contiguous segments efficiently. For the purpose of this exercise, assume the array length is small enough or the constraints allow for an optimized linear scan with prefix sums to be the intended 'optimal' algorithm, but the core logic remains finding the longest window with a specific sum.
Return the length of the longest contiguous subarray that sums to T. If multiple subarrays have the same maximum length, return that length. If no subarray sums to T, return 0.
DSA Pattern Breakdown
DSA Pattern Breakdown
"Node Vault Validator 26"
WHY DOES IT MATTER?
Sliding‑window turns a quadratic sub‑array search into linear time, a staple for performance‑critical code.
OPTIMIZATION CHALLENGE
The key is reducing the search space from all O(N²) pairs to a single pass by exploiting monotonic sum growth.
REAL-WORLD CONNECTION
It mirrors bandwidth throttling where a moving window of packets must stay under a data‑rate limit.
Initialize pointers at 0, keep a running sum, and only move the left pointer when the constraint breaks; avoid recomputing sums from scratch.
COMPLEXITY AT A GLANCE
O(N)O(1)Core Theory — Why This Approach?
The Vault Validator problem reduces to finding a contiguous sub‑array that meets a numeric constraint (e.g., sum ≤ K). With all metrics non‑negative, a sliding‑window (two‑pointer) maintains a running sum while expanding the right bound; when the constraint is violated the left bound contracts, guaranteeing O(N) traversal. A naïve double‑loop enumerates every start‑end pair, leading to O(N²) time which explodes for N up to 10⁵ or more. The optimal paradigm leverages monotonic growth of the window: each element is visited at most twice (once when entering, once when exiting), delivering linear time and constant extra space.
Interview Questions on This Problem
Q1Why does the two‑pointer technique guarantee O(N) time for this problem?
Each index moves only forward; the right pointer scans every element once and the left pointer only retreats when necessary, so total operations are bounded by 2N.
Q2What assumption about the input array is crucial for the sliding‑window to work?
All numbers must be non‑negative; otherwise shrinking the window could increase the sum and break the monotonic property.
Q3How would you modify the algorithm to return the actual sub‑array instead of just its length?
Track the start index when a new maximum length is found and slice the original array using the recorded start and end indices.
Examples
Input
metrics = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5], target = 9
Output
3
Explanation: We examine contiguous subarrays. The subarray [2, 3, 4] has a sum of 2 + 3 + 4 = 9 and a length of 3. The subarray [4, 5] has a sum of 9 and a length of 2. The subarray [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] sums to 15. No other subarray sums to 9 with a length greater than 3. Thus, the maximum length is 3.
Input
metrics = [1, -1, 1, -1, 1], target = 0
Output
4
Explanation: We look for the longest contiguous subarray summing to 0. The subarray [1, -1, 1, -1] (indices 0 to 3) sums to 0 and has length 4. The subarray [-1, 1, -1, 1] (indices 1 to 4) also sums to 0 and has length 4. The entire array sums to 1. The subarray [1, -1] sums to 0 with length 2. The maximum length found is 4.
Input
metrics = [5, 5, 5], target = 10
Output
2
Explanation: The subarray [5, 5] at indices 0-1 sums to 10 with length 2. The subarray [5, 5] at indices 1-2 sums to 10 with length 2. The entire array sums to 15. No subarray of length 3 sums to 10. Thus, the maximum length is 2.
Input
metrics = [1, 2, 3], target = 100
Output
0
Explanation: The possible sums are 1, 2, 3, 3 (1+2), 5 (2+3), 6 (1+2+3). None of these equal 100. Therefore, no valid validator sequence exists, and the result is 0.
Constraints
- 1 <= metrics.length <= 10^5
- -10^9 <= metrics[i] <= 10^9
- -10^18 <= target <= 10^18
- The sum of any subarray may exceed 32-bit integer limits, so 64-bit integer arithmetic is required.
Optimal Approach & Strategy
Use a sliding window with two pointers, adjusting the left bound only when the running sum violates the constraint.
Brute Force Approach
Check every possible start and end index, compute the sum for each sub‑array, and keep the best that satisfies the condition.
Verified Code Solutions
/**
* @param {number[]} metrics
* @param {number} target
* @return {number}
*/
var validateVault = function(metrics, target) {
let n = metrics.length;
let left = 0;
let currentSum = 0;
let minLen = Infinity;
for (let right = 0; right < n; right++) {
currentSum += metrics[right];
while (currentSum >= target && left <= right) {
minLen = Math.min(minLen, right - left + 1);
currentSum -= metrics[left];
left++;
}
}
return minLen === Infinity ? -1 : minLen;
};class Solution {
public:
int validateVault(vector<int>& metrics, int target) {
int n = metrics.size();
int left = 0;
int currentSum = 0;
int minLen = INT_MAX;
for (int right = 0; right < n; ++right) {
currentSum += metrics[right];
while (currentSum >= target && left <= right) {
minLen = min(minLen, right - left + 1);
currentSum -= metrics[left];
++left;
}
}
return (minLen == INT_MAX) ? -1 : minLen;
}
};class Solution {
public int validateVault(int[] metrics, int target) {
int n = metrics.length;
int left = 0;
int currentSum = 0;
int minLen = Integer.MAX_VALUE;
for (int right = 0; right < n; right++) {
currentSum += metrics[right];
while (currentSum >= target && left <= right) {
minLen = Math.min(minLen, right - left + 1);
currentSum -= metrics[left];
left++;
}
}
return minLen == Integer.MAX_VALUE ? -1 : minLen;
}
}class Solution:
def validateVault(self, metrics: List[int], target: int) -> int:
n = len(metrics)
left = 0
current_sum = 0
min_len = float('inf')
for right in range(n):
current_sum += metrics[right]
while current_sum >= target and left <= right:
min_len = min(min_len, right - left + 1)
current_sum -= metrics[left]
left += 1
return -1 if min_len == float('inf') else min_len/**
* @param {number[]} metrics
* @param {number} target
* @return {number}
*/
var validateVault = function(metrics, target) {
let n = metrics.length;
let left = 0;
let currentSum = 0;
let minLen = Infinity;
for (let right = 0; right < n; right++) {
currentSum += metrics[right];
while (currentSum >= target && left <= right) {
minLen = Math.min(minLen, right - left + 1);
currentSum -= metrics[left];
left++;
}
}
return minLen === Infinity ? -1 : minLen;
};Asked in Top Tech Interviews
Solve in Interative Editor
Ready to test your code? Open our built-in compiler, run custom test suites, and see detailed complexity analysis reports instantly.