Optimal Stage Index Shifts — Problem Statement & Solution Guide

ArraysMediumNEW OR EXISTING ID
TimeO(n log n)
|
SpaceO(n)

Quick Answer & Algorithm Key Takeaway

Master coding challenges related to Arrays and solve the Optimal Stage Index Shifts problem optimally.

TopicArrays
PatternNEW OR EXISTING ID
TimeO(n log n)
SpaceO(n)

Problem Description

You are given an array arr of n distinct non‑negative integers. The value of each element denotes the original index of a group that should appear on a stage. The desired final arrangement is the array sorted in strictly increasing order. In one operation you may select any element at position i (0 ≤ i < n, i > 0) and insert it at an earlier position j (0 ≤ j < i). The insertion shifts the elements in [j, i‑1] one step to the right. An operation is allowed only if the array remains strictly increasing after the insertion. Determine the minimum number of such operations required to transform arr into a strictly increasing sequence.

DSA Pattern Breakdown

DSA Pattern Breakdown

"Optimal Stage Index Shifts"

medium

WHY DOES IT MATTER?

The LIS pattern captures the maximal set of elements that are already in order, turning a seemingly combinatorial re‑ordering problem into a simple subtraction, which is a recurring theme in many interview problems involving minimum moves.

OPTIMIZATION CHALLENGE

Recognizing that each left‑insert can place an element anywhere earlier eliminates the need to simulate each shift; the challenge is to identify the longest increasing subsequence, which can be found in O(n log n) using binary search on a dynamic tail array.

REAL-WORLD CONNECTION

Think of a production line where items must exit in a specific order; workers can only pull items forward, not push them back. Keeping the longest already‑correct subsequence on the belt minimizes the number of manual pulls, analogous to minimizing left‑shifts in the array.

During the interview, first state the reduction to LIS, then immediately mention the O(n log n) patience‑sorting algorithm—this shows you understand both the problem transformation and the optimal data‑structure technique.

COMPLEXITY AT A GLANCE

⏱ Time:O(n log n)
💾 Space:O(n)

Core Theory — Why This Approach?

The problem reduces to finding the minimum number of left‑insert operations required to transform the given permutation into a sorted sequence. Because each operation can only move an element to an earlier position, any element that already appears in the correct relative order with respect to the others can be left untouched; all other elements must be pulled leftwards. This observation maps directly to the classic Longest Increasing Subsequence (LIS) problem: the longest subsequence that is already strictly increasing can stay in place, and every element outside this subsequence must be moved. A naive approach that simulates each possible insertion quickly explodes to O(n^2) or worse, as each move may require shifting many elements. The optimal paradigm leverages the patience‑sorting technique to compute the LIS length in O(n log n) time, allowing us to answer the minimal operation count as n‑LIS. This transformation from a sorting‑by‑shifts problem to LIS is the key theoretical insight that unlocks the efficient solution.

Interview Questions on This Problem

Q1How would you compute the minimum number of left‑insert operations to sort a distinct integer array, and why does the Longest Increasing Subsequence give the answer?

Compute the length of the LIS using the O(n log n) patience‑sorting method; the elements of the LIS are already in correct relative order and need no moves, so the answer is n minus that length.

Q2If the array may contain duplicate values, does the same LIS‑based solution work? Explain any modifications needed.

With duplicates the final sorted order is non‑decreasing, so we need the Longest Non‑Decreasing Subsequence instead; the binary‑search condition changes from < to ≤ when building the piles.

Q3Can you adapt the solution to also output the exact sequence of insert operations required? What additional data structures would you use?

Yes; while computing the LIS keep predecessor indices and a stack of chosen elements, then traverse the array from right to left moving any element not in the LIS to its correct earlier position, recording (i,j) pairs. A Fenwick tree can help locate the target j efficiently.

Examples

Example 1

Input

[4, 2, 5, 1, 3]

Output

3

Explanation: The sorted order is [1,2,3,4,5]. The longest increasing subsequence that can stay untouched is [2,5] (length 2). All other three elements (4,1,3) must be moved leftwards. One possible sequence of moves: 1) move element 1 (at index 3) to position 0 → [1,4,2,5,3]; 2) move element 3 (at index 4) to position 2 → [1,4,3,2,5]; 3) move element 4 (at index 1) to position 3 → [1,3,2,4,5] which is now sorted after a final left‑shift of 2 and 3. Hence 3 operations are sufficient and optimal.

Example 2

Input

[0,1,2,3]

Output

0

Explanation: The array is already strictly increasing, so no shift is needed.

Example 3

Input

[10, 5, 8, 3, 7, 12]

Output

4

Explanation: Sorted target: [3,5,7,8,10,12]. The longest increasing subsequence that respects the original order is [5,8,12] (length 3). Therefore 6‑3 = 3 elements must be moved. However element 10 cannot stay because it appears before 5 in the original order, so the actual LIS length is 2 ([5,12] or [8,12]). Consequently 6‑2 = 4 moves are required. One optimal sequence: move 3 to front, move 5 after 3, move 7 after 5, move 10 after 8.

Constraints

  • 1 <= arr.length <= 200000
  • 0 <= arr[i] <= 10^9
  • All arr[i] are distinct

Optimal Approach & Strategy

Compute the length of the longest increasing subsequence in O(n log n) and return n‑LIS as the minimal moves.

Brute Force Approach

Repeatedly scan the array, locate the smallest out‑of‑place element, and insert it at its correct earlier position, updating the array each time – O(n^2) time.

Code Solutions

JavaScript Solution
Time: O(n log n)
function minShifts(arr){
    const n = arr.length;
    if(n===0) return 0;
    const tails = [];
    for(const x of arr){
        let l=0, r=tails.length;
        while(l<r){
            const m = (l+r)>>1;
            if(tails[m] < x) l=m+1; else r=m;
        }
        if(l===tails.length) tails.push_back ? tails.push(x) : tails.push(x);
        else tails[l]=x;
    }
    return n - tails.length;
}
const fs = require('fs');
const input = fs.readFileSync(0,'utf8').trim().split(/\s+/).map(Number);
if(input.length){
    const n = input[0];
    const arr = input.slice(1,1+n);
    console.log(minShifts(arr));
}

Asked in Top Tech Interviews

RazorpayOracle

Solve in Interative Editor

Ready to test your code? Open our built-in compiler, run custom test suites, and see detailed complexity analysis reports instantly.