BackeasyGreedyCapgeminiMeesho

Calculated Pointer Alignment Solution

Problem Statement

In a high-throughput logistics center, incoming cargo crates are assigned a priority score based on their weight and destination urgency. The system processes these crates in a specific order to optimize dock usage. You are given an array crates of length N, where each element represents the priority score of a crate. The goal is to compute the 'Calculated Pointer Alignment', which is defined as the sum of the products of each crate's priority score and its 1-based index in the sorted sequence of priorities.

To determine the alignment, first sort the crates array in ascending order. Then, for each element at index i (where i ranges from 1 to N), multiply the element's value by i. The final result is the sum of these products. This metric helps the system balance the load across time slots, ensuring that lower-priority items are processed earlier in the sequence while higher-priority items contribute more significantly to the total alignment score due to their later positions.

Given the array crates, return the calculated pointer alignment as an integer. The computation must be efficient enough to handle large inputs within strict time limits.

Example 1
Input
crates = [3, 1, 2]
Output
14

Explanation: Step 1: Sort the array in ascending order: [1, 2, 3]. Step 2: Calculate the weighted sum using 1-based indices: - Index 1: 1 * 1 = 1 - Index 2: 2 * 2 = 4 - Index 3: 3 * 3 = 9 Step 3: Sum the products: 1 + 4 + 9 = 10.

Example 2
Input
crates = [5, 5, 5]
Output
30

Explanation: Step 1: Sort the array in ascending order: [5, 5, 5]. Step 2: Calculate the weighted sum using 1-based indices: - Index 1: 5 * 1 = 5 - Index 2: 5 * 2 = 10 - Index 3: 5 * 3 = 15 Step 3: Sum the products: 5 + 10 + 15 = 30.

Example 3
Input
crates = [10, 20, 30, 40]
Output
300

Explanation: Step 1: Sort the array in ascending order: [10, 20, 30, 40]. Step 2: Calculate the weighted sum using 1-based indices: - Index 1: 10 * 1 = 10 - Index 2: 20 * 2 = 40 - Index 3: 30 * 3 = 90 - Index 4: 40 * 4 = 160 Step 3: Sum the products: 10 + 40 + 90 + 160 = 300.

Example 4
Input
crates = [7, 2, 9, 4]
Output
67

Explanation: Step 1: Sort the array in ascending order: [2, 4, 7, 9]. Step 2: Calculate the weighted sum using 1-based indices: - Index 1: 2 * 1 = 2 - Index 2: 4 * 2 = 8 - Index 3: 7 * 3 = 21 - Index 4: 9 * 4 = 36 Step 3: Sum the products: 2 + 8 + 21 + 36 = 67. Wait, let me re-calculate. 2+8=10, 10+21=31, 31+36=67. Let me check the math again. 2*1=2, 4*2=8, 7*3=21, 9*4=36. Sum = 2+8+21+36 = 67. I will correct the output to 67.

Constraints

  • 1 <= crates.length <= 10^5
  • 1 <= crates[i] <= 10^9
  • The answer is guaranteed to fit in a 64-bit integer.
Live Compiler1 Free Run Available
Loading Editor...
Test Cases & Output
Click "Run" to test your 1 free compile trial!

🚀 Practice this problem

Run code, get AI hints & track streak

Sign Up Free

Calculated Pointer Alignment — Problem Statement & Solution Guide

GreedyEasyPriority Crate Allocation
TimeO(N log N)
|
SpaceO(1)

Problem Description

In a high-throughput logistics center, incoming cargo crates are assigned a priority score based on their weight and destination urgency. The system processes these crates in a specific order to optimize dock usage. You are given an array crates of length N, where each element represents the priority score of a crate. The goal is to compute the 'Calculated Pointer Alignment', which is defined as the sum of the products of each crate's priority score and its 1-based index in the sorted sequence of priorities.

To determine the alignment, first sort the crates array in ascending order. Then, for each element at index i (where i ranges from 1 to N), multiply the element's value by i. The final result is the sum of these products. This metric helps the system balance the load across time slots, ensuring that lower-priority items are processed earlier in the sequence while higher-priority items contribute more significantly to the total alignment score due to their later positions.

Given the array crates, return the calculated pointer alignment as an integer. The computation must be efficient enough to handle large inputs within strict time limits.

DSA Pattern Breakdown

DSA Pattern Breakdown

"Calculated Pointer Alignment"

easy

WHY DOES IT MATTER?

Mastering the two-pointer approach on sorted arrays enables you to solve complex optimization and pairing problems deterministically without resorting to dynamic programming or backtracking.

OPTIMIZATION CHALLENGE

The key insight is recognizing that sorting establishes a monotonic property, allowing two pointers to scan inwards and make local greedy choices without needing to re-evaluate past decisions.

REAL-WORLD CONNECTION

In distributed microservices, request load balancers pair heavy asynchronous compute tasks with lightweight ping tasks on worker threads to minimize peak CPU memory contention.

In technical interviews, always clarify whether modifying the original array in-place is permissible; if caller functions rely on original indices, store (value, index) tuples before sorting.

COMPLEXITY AT A GLANCE

⏱ Time:O(N log N)
💾 Space:O(1)

Core Theory — Why This Approach?

The 'Calculated Pointer Alignment' problem centers on pairing elements efficiently to optimize a combined metric (such as minimizing the maximum combined load or matching high-priority and low-priority items). When dealing with combinatorial matching, a naive examination of all pairings leads to an exponential search space of size O(N!). Applying a greedy strategy simplifies this by enforcing a strict global invariant: pairing extreme values (the smallest available with the largest available) consistently bounds the variance across pairs.

Interview Questions on This Problem

Q1How do you mathematically prove that pairing the i-th smallest element with the i-th largest element minimizes the maximum pair sum?

This can be proven using an exchange argument. Assume an optimal solution pairs elements out of extreme order such that A < B and C < D, but pairs (A, C) and (B, D). The maximum of these pairs is max(A+C, B+D) = B+D. If we swap the pairings to (A, D) and (B, C), the new maximum is max(A+D, B+C). Since A < B and C < D, B+C < B+D and A+D < B+D, ensuring the maximum pair sum does not increase. Repeated swaps prove the extreme-pairing greedy choice is always optimal.

Q2How would you adapt this greedy pointer alignment algorithm if crates arrive continuously via a real-time data stream?

If data arrives continuously, sorting the array on every step becomes prohibitively expensive at O(N log N). Instead, we maintain the elements in a dynamic balanced self-balancing search tree (like a Red-Black Tree or std::multiset in C++) or dual Min/Max Heaps. Extracting the minimum and maximum elements per pair then takes O(log N) time per operation, allowing real-time pointer alignment maintenance.

Q3What modifications are needed if crate values are tightly bounded integers within a small range [1, K]?

If crate values fall within a small range K where K << N, we can replace the O(N log N) comparison-based sort with Counting Sort (or Bucket Sort) running in O(N + K) time. We then use two pointers moving over the frequency array to pair smallest and largest available priorities in O(N + K) overall time and O(K) space.

Examples

Example 1

Input

crates = [3, 1, 2]

Output

14

Explanation: Step 1: Sort the array in ascending order: [1, 2, 3]. Step 2: Calculate the weighted sum using 1-based indices: - Index 1: 1 * 1 = 1 - Index 2: 2 * 2 = 4 - Index 3: 3 * 3 = 9 Step 3: Sum the products: 1 + 4 + 9 = 10.

Example 2

Input

crates = [5, 5, 5]

Output

30

Explanation: Step 1: Sort the array in ascending order: [5, 5, 5]. Step 2: Calculate the weighted sum using 1-based indices: - Index 1: 5 * 1 = 5 - Index 2: 5 * 2 = 10 - Index 3: 5 * 3 = 15 Step 3: Sum the products: 5 + 10 + 15 = 30.

Example 3

Input

crates = [10, 20, 30, 40]

Output

300

Explanation: Step 1: Sort the array in ascending order: [10, 20, 30, 40]. Step 2: Calculate the weighted sum using 1-based indices: - Index 1: 10 * 1 = 10 - Index 2: 20 * 2 = 40 - Index 3: 30 * 3 = 90 - Index 4: 40 * 4 = 160 Step 3: Sum the products: 10 + 40 + 90 + 160 = 300.

Example 4

Input

crates = [7, 2, 9, 4]

Output

67

Explanation: Step 1: Sort the array in ascending order: [2, 4, 7, 9]. Step 2: Calculate the weighted sum using 1-based indices: - Index 1: 2 * 1 = 2 - Index 2: 4 * 2 = 8 - Index 3: 7 * 3 = 21 - Index 4: 9 * 4 = 36 Step 3: Sum the products: 2 + 8 + 21 + 36 = 67. Wait, let me re-calculate. 2+8=10, 10+21=31, 31+36=67. Let me check the math again. 2*1=2, 4*2=8, 7*3=21, 9*4=36. Sum = 2+8+21+36 = 67. I will correct the output to 67.

Constraints

  • 1 <= crates.length <= 10^5
  • 1 <= crates[i] <= 10^9
  • The answer is guaranteed to fit in a 64-bit integer.

Optimal Approach & Strategy

Sort the array in ascending order to establish a monotonic sequence of crate priorities. Use two pointers starting at opposite ends (left = 0, right = N - 1) to iteratively pair the smallest and largest elements in O(N log N) total time.

Brute Force Approach

Generate all possible pairings of crates using recursion to evaluate every possible alignment combination. Measure each alignment metric and return the minimum peak value, resulting in O(N!) time complexity.

Verified Code Solutions

JavaScript Solution
Time: O(N log N)
/**
 * @param {number[]} crates
 * @return {number}
 */
var calculatedPointerAlignment = function(crates) {
    crates.sort((a, b) => a - b);
    let total = 0;
    for (let i = 0; i < crates.length; i++) {
        total += crates[i] * (i + 1);
    }
    return total;
};

console.log(calculatedPointerAlignment([3, 1, 2]));

Asked in Top Tech Interviews

CapgeminiMeesho

Solve in Interative Editor

Ready to test your code? Open our built-in compiler, run custom test suites, and see detailed complexity analysis reports instantly.