BackeasyBacktrackingGoogleAmazon

Node Matrix Optimizer 8 Solution

Problem Statement

Given a sequence of data elements representing node and matrix metrics, construct an optimal algorithm to evaluate and compute the target optimizer value under given operational constraints.

Example 1
Input
[200, 100, 50, 20, 10]
Output
200

Explanation: Step-by-step: Given the input array [200, 100, 50, 20, 10] and K = 100, we iterate through the array from left to right. The first element greater than K is 200, so the sum is 200.

Example 2
Input
[50, 20, 10]
Output
0

Explanation: Step-by-step: Given the input array [50, 20, 10] and K = 100, we iterate through the array from left to right. Since all elements are less than K, the sum is 0.

Constraints

  • 1 <= N <= 10^5
  • -10^4 <= metrics[i] <= 10^4
  • 1 <= K <= N
Live Compiler1 Free Run Available
Loading Editor...
Test Cases & Output
Click "Run" to test your 1 free compile trial!

🚀 Practice this problem

Run code, get AI hints & track streak

Sign Up Free

Node Matrix Optimizer 8 — Problem Statement & Solution Guide

BacktrackingEasyRecursive Backtracking
TimeO(2^n) (pruned by constraints)
|
SpaceO(n)

Problem Description

Given a sequence of data elements representing node and matrix metrics, construct an optimal algorithm to evaluate and compute the target optimizer value under given operational constraints.

DSA Pattern Breakdown

DSA Pattern Breakdown

"Node Matrix Optimizer 8"

easy

WHY DOES IT MATTER?

Backtracking transforms an intractable exponential search into a tractable one by eliminating dead ends early.

OPTIMIZATION CHALLENGE

The key is to cut the recursion tree size from O(2^n) to a manageable fraction via pruning and ordering.

REAL-WORLD CONNECTION

It mirrors constraint‑driven scheduling where tasks (nodes) must fit into limited slots (matrix cells).

Implement recursive calls with a single mutable state (e.g., bitmask) and restore it on backtrack to avoid costly copies.

COMPLEXITY AT A GLANCE

⏱ Time:O(2^n) (pruned by constraints)
đź’ľ Space:O(n)

Core Theory — Why This Approach?

Backtracking systematically explores all configurations of node‑matrix assignments by building partial solutions and abandoning them as soon as they violate constraints. This depth‑first search creates a recursion tree whose size grows exponentially, but pruning invalid branches early dramatically reduces the explored state space. Naïve enumeration would generate every permutation of nodes and matrix entries, leading to O(n!) or O(2^n) time even for modest n, quickly exhausting time limits. The optimal paradigm leverages constraint propagation—checking feasibility at each step, ordering choices by heuristic (e.g., most constrained node first), and using memoization or bitmasking to reuse sub‑problem results, thereby collapsing many redundant paths.

Interview Questions on This Problem

Q1How does backtracking differ from brute‑force recursion in terms of state pruning?

Backtracking adds early exit checks that discard infeasible partial solutions, while brute‑force explores every leaf regardless of constraints. This pruning cuts the effective branching factor and reduces runtime.

Q2Why is ordering nodes by the fewest valid matrix slots beneficial?

Choosing the most constrained node first maximizes the chance of early failure, eliminating large subtrees early. It leads to a tighter search space and often exponential speed‑up.

Q3What role does bitmasking play in optimizing backtracking for this problem?

Bitmasking encodes used matrix positions in O(1) time checks and updates, enabling fast feasibility tests. It also reduces memory overhead compared to explicit boolean arrays.

Examples

Example 1

Input

[200, 100, 50, 20, 10]

Output

200

Explanation: Step-by-step: Given the input array [200, 100, 50, 20, 10] and K = 100, we iterate through the array from left to right. The first element greater than K is 200, so the sum is 200.

Example 2

Input

[50, 20, 10]

Output

0

Explanation: Step-by-step: Given the input array [50, 20, 10] and K = 100, we iterate through the array from left to right. Since all elements are less than K, the sum is 0.

Constraints

  • 1 <= N <= 10^5
  • -10^4 <= metrics[i] <= 10^4
  • 1 <= K <= N

Optimal Approach & Strategy

Recursively assign nodes, prune as soon as a constraint fails, and use a bitmask to track occupied cells for O(1) checks.

Brute Force Approach

Generate all possible assignments of nodes to matrix cells and test each full configuration for validity.

Verified Code Solutions

JavaScript Solution
Time: O(2^n) (pruned by constraints)
function solution(nums, k) {
   let sum = 0;
   for (let i = 0; i < nums.length; i++) {
       if (nums[i] > k) {
           sum += nums[i];
       }
   }
   return sum;
}

Asked in Top Tech Interviews

GoogleAmazonMicrosoft

Solve in Interative Editor

Ready to test your code? Open our built-in compiler, run custom test suites, and see detailed complexity analysis reports instantly.